Latest News
|
« FIFA World Cup lacks the emotion of RWC'95 | | Tweet Treats - Volume XVI » June 28, 2010 Posted on 06/28/2010 Rugby can teach football a thing or two
Pop Quiz: Who was in the TMO booth when TV technology made its debut on the international rugby stage? (answer to follow...) Now, I'm not normally one for kicking a man when he is down but in this instance I am more than happy to wield our sport for a little Blatter-bashing. Putting the real story to one side, that being England's astounding mediocrity, FIFA president Sepp Blatter's historical reluctance to embrace technology in the form of TV replays has always seemed nonsensical and two high profile errors - the decision not to award Frank Lampard a goal against Germany and the equally woeful call to allow an offside effort from Argentina's Carlos Tevez to stand - have made the sport look even more foolish. How a sport with football's status can let itself be dragged into such a mire is beyond me. With the eyes of the world watching, football has scored an outrageous own goal that only BP chief executive Tony Hayward will have applauded as the media spotlight passed, if only briefly, onto another unfortunate individual. Rugby can learn a great deal from football - especially as it continues to labour in its professional infancy - but in one respect, at least, rugby can teach its sporting cousin a valuable lesson. Rugby may not have been the first to embrace TV technology to aid with game management but they were quick to realise the benefits and the fact that those pros certainly outweighed the cons. The 'Television Match Official', as he is now known, made his international bow back in 2000 after being trialled on the domestic stage within the southern hemisphere's Super 12 competition. English referee Steve Lander was the first to call on a TMO to pass judgement on whether a try had been scored during New Zealand's rout of Tonga in Albany - and Kiwi Steve Walsh subsequently awarded a try to All Blacks captain Todd Blackadder. England fans may remember a more contentious TMO decision the same summer during the Springboks' narrow 18-13 win in Pretoria. England fullback Tim Stimpson appeared to be tackled without the ball by South Africa's Andre Vos as he looked to get a try-scoring touch to a loose ball but the TMO ruled a knock on. On that occasion the officials may have got it wrong but that was not the case in the 2007 Rugby World Cup Final when England's Mark Cueto saw a try ruled out by the TMO - funnily enough against the Springboks again. These examples show that the technology will not always provide a definitive answer and we must still rely on the interpretation of the images by a real person, and they are prone to the odd error, but in most cases TMO decisions provide the clarity that is sought and are controversy-free thanks to the superb tools available to broadcasters and the sport. Some of the decisions are still hotly debated - and in some cases rightly so as there are still some dubious calls being made. But in the vast majority of instances, the input of the TMO is a welcome one and the delay - a few seconds at best and a few minutes at worst - is a small price to pay for the integrity of the sport. Original concerns about robbing the game of one of its key elements - continuity - have long since vanished and the International Rugby Board must be applauded for embracing technology all of those years ago and sticking with it as the marriage between the two worked through some difficult early years. Sadly for football, the second World Cup on the trot is set to be remembered for all the wrong reasons - in 2006 it was Zinedine Zidane's shocking head-butting of Marco Materazzi whereas this time around the dark cloud of controversy stretches from Thierry Henry's handball in qualifying all the way to the officials' foul-up in Bloemfontein and Johannesburg. Admittedly rugby has its issues - Bloodgate to name just one - but at least the IRB and the RFU talk a good game about addressing them. FIFA on the other hand appear happy to fly in the face of common sense on this issue and as a result will continue to be dogged by needless controversy until they join the 21st Century. Comments Posted Bobby on 06/29/2010 Gridiron, a game developed from the Rugby Union roots, started the TMO concept in 1986. The 1999 reinstating of replay changed the TMO to an administrative role where the referee has control over "the dome" to watch replays in 1080i and make the call himself. International, professional and US intercollegiate basketball and baseball have adopted limited replay (US intercollegiate baseball, improper collisions are reviewable). Why can't soccer adopt this? Posted colin on 06/29/2010 To me, it seems like the only reason Blatter doesn't want to embrace this, is simply because he will be following other sports and it seems like his own idea to be something of a first, so that he can gloat about it for many years to come. I guess, thats why rugby is still considered a gentlemans sport and the ethos of the sport still lives strong, whereby,if we think we are at fault, we strong enough to put our hands up and admit it. Posted Alberto Radici on 06/29/2010 It's not that simple. Not all situations can be easyly solved by just one look, many different pictures from different angles might be needed. In rugby this can be done as the play would have stopped anyway, not so in football. What happens if the ref calls for a stop and nothing relevant is found ? Let the ball bounce and go on ? How many times this could happen in a match before everybody gets mad about this "stop and go" ? And what if the TMO says to the ref that 2 minutes earlier the ball went out for a corner but he didn't see it ? Get back to that point turning back the clock ? What if either team had scored in the meantime ? Posted phil on 06/29/2010 Certainly, the use of instant reply can be impleted on an experimental and limited level. Try it at a non WC level for a season. Limit reviews to only direct play that leads to a goal - offsides, foul play, or determing if the ball actually crossed the required line. Take a page from the NFL and allow teams 1 challenge per match or place the responsibility in the hands of the referee. Posted RPJ on 07/01/2010 In response to Alberto. The discussion here is only about the awarding of goals. Everyone agrees that reviewing every play would ruin the game. The ability to review goals prior to them being awarded would have solved the Tevez issue and the implementation of goal line technology with some sort of visual indicator (a light behind the goal or something) near the goal would have instantly given the refs the info they needed to award Lampard's goal. Having said that, I think the controversy adds to the flavour of the game and I'm a Blatter supporter. Posted Noah on 07/05/2010 I feel horrible for ghana. I think another thing Rugby could give to soccer is this. If there a player commits a penalty to prevent a goal that would definitely (i mean 100%, for sure, no doubt) have occured (like ghana's, but verrrrrry rare). dont give him a penalty kick, give him the damned goal
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||